In a software sector as over-saturated as video conversion, it's helpful to at least have some idea of what's around as both freeware and payware:

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/best-free-video-converter-12-on-test-1059245

http://www.safetricks.com/best-video-converter-software-for-pc

And as so many products are derived from a masterwork freely resourced and continually improved by a global community of contributing developers -- the Open Source FFmpeg -- then knowing something about the tree from which all those (often expensive) branches have grown is also useful:

https://www.ffmpeg.org/about.html

Today's 4Videosoft Video Converter 6.0 is commercial software that though free today inevitably comes with a sticker price that will have to be borne if ever a re-install is required. You can, therefore, consider paying yer money and making yer choice if that day ever comes along.

Or you can equally consider never paying any money at any time for any video conversion software at all, and be your own 'developer':

http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/how-to-build-the-ultimate-media-converter-no-experience-required--1274397

That link is to an excellent TechRadar article first published back in November 2014. I've recommended it to many a friend and colleague, and see no reason not to do so here today. FFMpeg does not require anyone to be a coding genius.

MikeR  –  8 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+52)

翻訳

played with this one before, total waste of money. All their "tools" to improve video did absolutely nothing, and the converted videos only played for half of the video length. I highly doubt much has changed in three weeks since I wasted money on this one. Hopefully, someone here will have better luck I managed. Has a really easy to use interface and isn't complex in the slightest bit (at least to me), I only had the main issues of never being able to watch the second half of the video (regardless of size. From a 5 second clip to full length movie, always right at the half way mark the video just stopped like it was at the end) and the failure of the "enhancing" features.

Levitiquetus  –  8 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+34)

翻訳

Levitiquetus,
Downloaded and did a quick test, much to my surprise I have exactly the same problem regarding length. Mine only did about one third of the length correctly after which I just got coloured squares.
The enhancement did modify the image on the short bit it correctly converted.
All in all a very big disappointment on XP SP 3 OS.

Levitiquetus, Downloaded and did a quick test, much to my surprise I have exactly the same problem regarding length. Mine only did about one third of the length correctly after which I just got coloured squares. The enhancement did modify the image on the short bit it correctly converted. All in all a very big disappointment on XP SP 3 OS.
Save | Cancel

Salvia  –  8 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+25)

翻訳

Levitiquetus, Thanks for the heads up, if that's what you get with a paid for version I think I'll give this a miss today. Did you contact their customer support for help or even a refund. I'd be interested to hear what happened?

Levitiquetus, Thanks for the heads up, if that's what you get with a paid for version I think I'll give this a miss today. Did you contact their customer support for help or even a refund. I'd be interested to hear what happened?
Save | Cancel

Lenny  –  8 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+17)

翻訳

In my previous comment stated problems regarding length of video and I wondered after it was the video codec used on the conversion from MP4 to Avi using the default codec.
Tried another test using FLV to Avi via H264 and had no problems with the output.
Decided to try with MP4 to Avi again using H264 the result was a disaster, an overlay telling me the aspect ratio kept appearing and the aspect ratio of the video kept changing.

An extremely buggy piece of software that needs fixing.

Just a quick word about enhancement, Aiseesoft does a very similar converter that uses it and it does considerably improve the perceived visual quality of the output.
It does it so well that often I'll convert a video just to make it more pleasing to the eye.

Salvia  –  8 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+20)

翻訳