Be very careful when installing this.
It likes to change your search engines and would like to install
few software more.

I don't like this kind of software.
It maybe good but thumbs down.

Tapet Klister  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+234)

翻訳

It's not a bad tool, but why the heck charge 30 bucks if you can do the same things and even more for FREE?

http://www.imgburn.com/index.php?act=download&
https://cdburnerxp.se/
http://soft4boost.com/easy-disc-burner
http://updatepack.nl/downloads/nero-lite/nero-7-lite/
http://www.anyburn.com/

LOL! US company from NEVADA or from the MOON?

^_^

Giovanni Mr FREE  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+123)

翻訳

Installed and registered without problems on a Win 8.1 Pro 64 bit system.

A US company from Nevada with address&fax and a picture of a nice looking lady. The awards really exist. tested on two of them.

Wow, a GOLD! burn. The program is from December 2011 and digitally signed from a Chinese company : Tsingsoft Imagination Information Technology Co., Ltd ... making use of leftovers? No further company info in the I-Net.

The license agreement in the installation procedure is invalid - the "contract partner" is a not specified FAE limited trading...

Upon start a non resizable window opens, you have the choice to burn data, video or audio files and there is a tools button for erasing rewritable disks or handling .ISO.

This is quite simple - seems to work. I did not test every task, only writing data to a disk, which every program can handle (or should).

A simple tool, not needed by the one, who has already a burning program. Uninstalled via reboot.

I would not use even the platinum version of this gold tool.

--------------------------------------------
An addendum to the yesterday's software - -A little math to the password brute force cracking, questions about speed and how much kernels are used.

A computer, which can test 1 billion passwords per second, tests (60x60x24x365x1,000,000,000) 3,15
16 passwords per year. Wow!, what a number! If you bundle 1 million of these supercomputers (think of the energy costs!) you crack 3,15 22 passwords per year…
If you create a password from letters and numbers (a..z,A..Z,0..9) with a password length of 15 characters, you have a password with 2,82 26 possibilities. To crack these with the above mentioned supercomputerbundle, you’ll need roundabout 9 billion years. Longer passwords are only of hypothetical use…
So don’t worry about used kernel, processor speed or other minor details. A longer password CANNOT be cracked by brute force, not now and not in the next future by nobody.

Karl  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+109)

翻訳

#1 Tapet Klister Be very careful when installing this.
It likes to change your search engines and would like to install
few software more.

This is only done by the installer, you load from their webpage. The GOATD installer is free of this "additions". It is safe!

Karl  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+75)

翻訳

#3 Karl.

Your advice about passwords being so difficult to crack is VERY out of date. There are many articles on how easy it is now, like Bruce Schneier's.

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/a_really_good_a.html

Use of rainbow tables, graphics cards processors and dictionaries that already contain words where letters have been substituted with numbers and characters AND contain all the different passwords from the databases of passwords that have been stolen in the past, make it MUCH easier than the numbers you give for brute force attacks.

Sorry, but the numbers you quote are wrong and misleading. It is more important than ever for people to pick unique passphrases. Read Bruce's writings, he is probably the world's leading expert on security and you will understand that math like you wrote are nothing like modern hackers do anymore.

Brian  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+45)

翻訳