Installed and registered without problems on a Win 8.1.3 Pro 64 bit system.

We had the same version on October 13, 2014. The .exe is still from July 2014.
Here are the old reviews:
http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/inpaint-6-0/

My old review is still valid.
It is alarmingly simple to use. Draw a selection around the object you wish to remove from the picture, and run smart remove selection

Alarmingly simple, but also simply insufficient. There is no magic, all depends from the original photo, the objects, the background.

A new example today:
Before: http://www0.xup.to/exec/ximg.php?fid=46338858
After: http://www0.xup.to/exec/ximg.php?fid=66739951

If you can live with that: good, than install it.

Uninstalled via reboot, I'll work with my old clone stamp.

Karl  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+51)

翻訳

Hello Karl, I usually enjoy reading your comments, however the image you chose today, to show the abilities of Inpaint was a 'non-starter', as I am sure you knew when you elected to use this example. Did you really think a crowd of people, (in France), was a fair image to use. It's obvious you wanted the program to fail. I have used the program a few times over the years and it does a darn good job in many instances—saving a huge amount of time versus using the clone stamp alone. Even when the results are less than perfect, it can be 'fine tuned' afterwards with a photo editing program.
Is it infallible in every instance? No, you did prove that with your example Karl.

Hello Karl, I usually enjoy reading your comments, however the image you chose today, to show the abilities of Inpaint was a 'non-starter', as I am sure you knew when you elected to use this example. Did you really think a crowd of people, (in France), was a fair image to use. It's obvious you wanted the program to fail. I have used the program a few times over the years and it does a darn good job in many instances—saving a huge amount of time versus using the clone stamp alone. Even when the results are less than perfect, it can be 'fine tuned' afterwards with a photo editing program. Is it infallible in every instance? No, you did prove that with your example Karl.
Save | Cancel

Mister Lee  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+65)

翻訳

Installs and runs fine on windows 8.1. Auto replaces previous installations.
Simple to use software that works.
My example from a previous give away is here:

http://1drv.ms/1KMq0GC

Like in photoshop, care and a bit of work is needed to achieve acceptable results - but - as long as you do not go flying in with big "marker" for edits and take a little at a time, the software does do a good job.

Genealogy101  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+53)

翻訳

This was offered not too long ago. It's a nice program that can handle your needs as long as the image is not too busy. You will get better results taking it slow and erasing the unwanted portions little by little. More time consuming but worth the effort. My only complaint is the program will not remember your default folder. Each and every time you start the program you must start in it's default folder and navigate your way to the folder of your choice. It does not remember your marker size or your picture quality setting either. I know these are minor faults. I am no programmer but I think it should be no trouble for the publisher to have the program write to some ini type file to save user preferences. Those small details aside, this is certainly a worthy program to have and I am thankful for the offer.

dadams  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+48)

翻訳

This is the absolute BEST program in it's genre. I've used it for many years with great results. Thank you Teorex ans GOTD.

Gary  –  9 years ago  –  このコメントは役に立ちましたか？ はい | いいえ (+26)

翻訳