毎日 通常購入しなくては使用できないソフトウエアを無料で提供します!
Macrorit Data Wiper Pro Edition 2016 (Local & Portable)< のgiveaway は 2016年12月30日
Macroritデータワイパー-可能性の回復にデータを返します。 完全に恒久的に拭き取り感度のデータディスクドライブの数量またはディスクパーティションです。 すべてサポートし人気のWindowsファイルシステム、FAT16/32,NTFS,Ext2/3/4、アップルHFS+その他のファイルシステムです。 Macroritディスクパーティションワイパーは専用の便利な使用します。 インストールパッケージに沿って小さなサイズのインストールプロセスは高速です。 この概要は、このディスクワイパーソフトウェアツールの管理が簡単で理解しても、初心者のコンピュータです。 このツールに最適なディスクドライブます。 それを占めるシステム資源です。 ま5拭き取ります。 選択できるのが適切であると考えます。
ご注意:アーカイブも含まれ、ポータブル版
Windows XP/ Vista/ 7/ 8/ 8.1/ 10/ Server 2003/ Server 2008/ Serer 2012 (32 and 64 bit)
18.3 MB
$29.95
コメント Macrorit Data Wiper Pro Edition 2016 (Local & Portable)
Please add a comment explaining the reason behind your vote.
I am not an expert in computing, and my fear is that some day a software of this kind one day gets crazy and wipes everything in my HD; just by itself, or because I make the click to make this happen. Am I very wrong to be afraid of this? I believe this kind of software is for experienced people. Thanks.
Save | Cancel
I have a question about this software. I use CCleaner and CCleaner has a "Drive Wiper" selection in it's tools menu that will let you wipe either free space or an entire drive using 1,3,7, or 35 passes with various methods to delete free space.
I see this software can fill free space with zero's, aside from that being different in comparison to CCleaner, does it have any more to offer by comparison?
I see this software can be made into a portable version, but you can also get CCleaner as a portable version.
Save | Cancel
Adrian, No I didn't forget, my question was concerning a comparison between CCleaner's drive wiper functions and this software, I don't use the two you mentioned.
Save | Cancel
http://www.howtogeek.com/115573/htg-explains-why-you-only-have-to-wipe-a-disk-once-to-erase-it/
Save | Cancel
Francesco,
Yes, we should all take the word of a blogger over dozens of government agencies and hundreds of forensics organizations and an entire industry built on data recovery from erased and damaged drives.
The flaw in the article's argument is that he points out that Gutmann's paper was written in 1996 and cites the age of hard drive technology since then but doesn't acknowledge 20 years' progress of forensic technology.
Personally, I write all 1s, then all 0s, then alternating (0xA) when not doing DoD work.
Save | Cancel